Place: the sum of parts? Think piece #3
By John Bishop When I re-read the flyer for the debate, I realised that the Series title “A Place for […]
New podcast / Place: designed for sharing?
On 21 October in Edinburgh we launched our 2015/16 Debate Series with the question – Place: designed for sharing? Our […]
Place: the sum of parts? Think piece #2
By Jez Hall A little story about Levenshulme’s secret lake (this piece leads on from Jez Hall’s first think piece […]
Place: the sum of parts? Think piece #1
By Jez Hall Place for a community to live The upcoming Glass-House Manchester debate on ‘Place, a sum of parts?’ […]
Place: designed for sharing? A round-up of our recent Edinburgh debate
Last Wednesday in Edinburgh, we held the first debate in our 2015/16 Series, A Place for Everyone?, which explores the […]
Place: designed for sharing? Think piece #1
By Becca Thomas A place for everyone: socially engaged design and spaces “The true purpose of architecture is to help […]
To a More Ambitious Place: looking back to look forward
As we warm up for this year’s Glass-House Debate Series, let’s take a final look at where we ended the […]
Do we accept the status quo in place? A round-up of our London debate
“We are both too ambitious and not ambitious enough” opened our first speaker, Alastair Donald on Wednesday at our fourth […]
To a More Ambitious Place: Do we accept the status quo in place? Think piece #3
By Alexei Schwab The pressure is on for London to build more homes, and we are seeing a raft of […]
To a More Ambitious Place: Do we accept the status quo in place? Think piece #2
By Sir Tom Shebbeare An amateur planner: asset or a hazard? Challenging the status quo by using the tool of […]